Do you still not quite get what I, Dr. Ideaman, have to say about the economy? When I say that a monthly salary of 4,000 dollers, 400,000 yen should be the minimum, do you think that's the ideal, but...?
Great!
Let's make something easier to understand.
Let's say there is a factory that fills 300 gram parallelogram-shaped sauce packs using a sauce filling machine.
Let's assume that this is named the 300-parallelogram, and that each the 300-parallelogram costs $30.
Let's say that 8,000 units are manufactured in one shift, with 8 hours of work per shift.
30 x 8,000 = 240,000
Sales will be $240 thousands.
If we assume that there are three shifts per day,
$240 thousands x 3 shifts/day = $720 thousands
That's how it works.
Let's assume that one month is 30 days.
$720 thousands x 30 days = $21.6 millions
And so it looks like this.
...Wow! Sales of $21.6 million in one month!
I don't know how much the materials, packaging, and utility costs are, but let's say it's $18 million for now. That's not true, but I'll be very generous here.
$21.6 million - $18 million = $3.6 million
Monthly profit is $3.6 million.
Come on! This is where it starts, right?
Let's say the average labor cost is $3,000/month. There are 60 employees.
300,000 x 60 = $0.18 million. $180 thousands.
Monthly labor costs are $0.18 million, $180 thousands, right? Monthly profit is 3.6 million, but labor costs are only 0.18 million, right?
...Um...you'll get a monthly salary of $4,000, right? Even with such a biased calculation, that's the amount. ...It doesn't seem like a big salary increase would make a dent, does it?
If you try to guess the profit from the unit prices of products at your workplace, you might think...Huh? That's strange.
Let's say one letter costs $0.8. ...or something like that. If you do the math, you'll understand, but...oh, that's strange! In this case, assuming an average of 80,000 letters per day, 25 working days, the monthly sales are $1.6 million . With an average monthly salary of $3,000 , 200 employees, labor costs are $600 thousands. Well, liabilities? It depends on how much the necessary expenses are.
Well then.
I pointed out before that in this case, it is assumed that the president alone is entitled to receive a high salary... and that is because, if the company's management goes under or the company goes bankrupt, the employees will not have to make up the losses - it will be the president who will have to pay them. The security deposit for employees in the event of bankruptcy is paid by the president, and if the president does not have the money for this, the amount that cannot be paid even if the company's land is sold, then the president will be out on the street if the company goes bankrupt. I speculate that it may be dangerous for a tenant company because the land cannot be sold.Therefore, it is inevitable that the president alone receives a high salary to save for loss compensation such as bankruptcy reserves. Surely, there is no way to have a lot of vacant land. If it is not vacant, it cannot be sold, right? Currently, due to the rules and laws of accounting and bookkeeping, one way to save money wisely is for the president alone to receive a high salary and save for bankruptcy reserves.But... But? Even then, if the accounting department carefully calculates the necessary expenses as bankruptcy reserves, they can calculate out the necessary expenses, so there must be a strict upper limit, an upper limit for this bankruptcy reserve. There must be one, right? If the savings are accumulated in the president's savings, it would be strange for him to take anything above that amount, and it should be distributed equally to the employees, so that's how it goes. It's distributed equally, right? Aren't you overlooking mid-career hires and those changing jobs? What about women?
...Other directors? Will they pay money when the company goes bankrupt? ...No way, right? So it's strange for other directors to receive such a high amount. ...Well, I think it would be reasonable to pay a certain amount so that there is no dissatisfaction.